Pepperi alternatives

Ranked options

This list weighs public pricing, fit for wholesale operations, and the amount of structure you can see before you commit. BoxNCase leads because it publishes plan limits and pricing on its site, which helps you assess scope before a sales call. The other entries reflect common buying paths for teams that want B2B ordering, commerce, mobile sales, or a broader platform stack. Use the summaries to narrow the shortlist, then compare product depth, implementation effort, and the parts of your workflow that must stay in one system.

1. 1.BoxNCase

   Teams that want published pricing and a simple start with wholesale ordering.

   BoxNCase publishes a Free plan at $0 per month with up to 1 store and up to 200 SKUs, so you can test the workflow before you talk to sales.^[4] Starter adds up to 3 stores and up to 2,000 SKUs for $79 per month.^[5][6] Brand and Enterprise fit larger catalogs and more stores when you need more control over the stack. It is the clearest fit here if you want public plan information and a direct path from trial to rollout.^{[1][2][7][6][8][9]}

   Strengths

   • Publishes plan pricing and limits on the public site.^[1]
   • Lets you start with a Free plan at $0 per month.^[1]
   • Covers small and larger store counts with published tiers.^{[2][8][13][15]}

   Trade-offs

   • Free plan stays narrow at 1 store and 200 SKUs.^[2][7]
   • Higher tiers require reviewing plan fit with your own workflow.
   • You still need to compare channel needs against Pepperi's broader platform scope.

2. 2.Pepperi

   Teams that want an established B2B commerce platform with mobile sales options.

   Pepperi says it serves 1000+ medium and enterprise customers across 65+ countries.^[3] It also supports iPad and Android users with the same credentials, and plans can be annual or month-to-month. Because Pepperi does not publish pricing on its public site, you will usually need a sales conversation to size the deal and confirm the contract path. It is a reasonable benchmark if mobile selling, field usage, and a broad B2B platform matter to your team.^[3][10][11]

   Strengths

   • Supports iPad and Android users with the same credentials.^[11]
   • Offers annual and month-to-month plans.^[10]
   • Shows a sizable customer footprint on its homepage.^[3]

   Trade-offs

   • Does not publish pricing on its public site.
   • Refunds are not given for cancellation or downgrades.^[10]
   • You need a sales step before you can compare plan cost.

3. 3.Brandboom

   Teams that want wholesale presentation and line-sheet style selling.

   Brandboom is usually part of the conversation when the selling motion looks like a showroom, collection review, or guided order capture. That makes it relevant for teams that care about product presentation as much as checkout. If your process includes buyer-facing discovery and assortment review, it belongs on the shortlist. Compare its workflow against Pepperi and BoxNCase based on how much of the order path you want in one place.

   Strengths

   • Fits presentation-led wholesale selling.
   • Useful when buyer review matters early in the process.
   • Worth comparing if your team uses line sheets.

   Trade-offs

   • Workflow emphasis may differ from strict order entry.
   • You still need to test how reps and buyers use it.
   • Public pricing may not answer every scoping question.

4. 4.JOOR

   Teams that sell into wholesale accounts with a fashion or showroom motion.

   JOOR is a common alternative when your business needs account management, buyer access, and a catalog that supports the sales process around it. It tends to fit teams that care about presentation and order capture in the same workflow. If your current process is not just taking orders, but managing a broader buying relationship, JOOR belongs in the review set. Measure it against Pepperi based on workflow fit, not feature lists alone.

   Strengths

   • Suited to account-based wholesale selling.
   • Can fit presentation and order capture in one flow.
   • Often considered by teams with showroom processes.

   Trade-offs

   • May be more platform than a small team needs.
   • You should verify implementation effort early.
   • Fit depends on how much presentation you need.

5. 5.Faire

   Brands that want marketplace-led wholesale demand generation.

   Faire comes up when the question is not only order entry, but also how buyers find products in the first place. That makes it useful for brands that want a marketplace channel alongside their own selling motion. It is not the same operating model as a private B2B order system, so compare it with Pepperi only if buyer discovery and marketplace reach matter to you. It can sit alongside direct selling, but the role is different.

   Strengths

   • Useful when marketplace discovery matters.
   • Can add another wholesale demand channel.
   • Fits brands that want outside buyer traffic.

   Trade-offs

   • It is a different operating model from direct B2B ordering.
   • Marketplace rules may shape how you sell.
   • Not every team wants another channel to manage.

6. 6.Orderchamp

   Brands that want a wholesale marketplace with buyer discovery.

   Orderchamp belongs on the list if you want wholesale buyers to find products in a marketplace setting and you want a route to orders without building every buyer relationship from scratch. It is useful for teams that value discovery and digital assortment browsing. Compare it with Pepperi if your current plan includes marketplace reach, not only account tools. If you mainly need private ordering for known accounts, the fit may be different.

   Strengths

   • Supports marketplace-style buyer discovery.
   • Useful for digital assortment browsing.
   • Can help with route-to-order workflows.

   Trade-offs

   • Marketplace fit may not suit private account selling.
   • You may still need a separate direct channel.
   • Operational control depends on your channel strategy.

7. 7.Shopify

   Teams that want a general commerce stack with many extensions.

   Shopify is a broader commerce platform, so it enters the comparison when you want to build around a flexible storefront and app ecosystem. It can be adapted to wholesale use, but you should map your actual process before you decide. Compare it with Pepperi if you need more general commerce structure or want to assemble a stack from components. If your team wants a more specific B2B sales workflow, a narrower tool may be easier to run.

   Strengths

   • Broad commerce platform with a large app ecosystem.
   • Can be adapted for wholesale use.
   • Useful when you want flexible storefront tooling.

   Trade-offs

   • May require more setup for wholesale needs.
   • App choices can add operational complexity.
   • Not every B2B workflow fits a general stack cleanly.

How to choose

What to compare side by side

Who should stay with Pepperi

• Stay with Pepperi if your team already depends on its iPad and Android workflow and does not need a public price to start the review.^[11]
• Stay with Pepperi if annual or month-to-month contract options are enough and your team is comfortable with a sales-led purchase path.^[10]
• Stay with Pepperi if you want a platform that already serves 1000+ medium and enterprise customers across 65+ countries.^[3]
• Stay with Pepperi if mobile selling is central and you want the same credentials across device types.^[11]

Questions and answers